Category: Social Media

The illusion behind Facebook’s Social Graph

Thought provoking as ever, Stephen Johnson has written a piece for Wired Magazine on the Unstoppable rise of Facebook, in light of its IPO. I think it’s with supreme irony that Facebook could not have existed without the open nature of the internet, and yet it has constructed a closed environment of its own.

What the Facebook platform has done is to demystify how we interact in the digital world. As Johnson eloquently puts it:

…the bigger we make the platform, the stronger its gravitational pull. The Internet—meaning everything from email to file trading to voice-over-IP phone calls—was always technically larger than the web, but the web’s mass adoption managed somehow to overwhelm the vessel that contained it. The web became the main attraction; the packets and DNS lookups became the plumbing, essential but invisible. Facebook now threatens to perform that same jujitsu against the web itself.

In the last Google Firestarters, Cory Doctorow spoke about the dangers of having the views of the an influential minority dictate how we use software and hardware. It’s the open architecture inherent within them that allows us to explore, to experiment, to evolve. Facebook seems intent on doing all that within its own walled garden and yet still relies on growth in numbers to sustain its social graph.

It’s questionable whether you can sustain continual growth within a closed network. History has taught us otherwise, as John Willshire expands upon the fate that met the Easter Island inhabitants. The inhabitants continued to build statues right to the point when the island’s resources could no longer sustain that activity.

So the only meaningful way Facebook can maintain its value is to become a destination of compelling content. But there’s a problem, it relies on that content either being sucked in from outside e.g. the web or internally through a preferred partner e.g. brands or apps.

Arguably it’s not a place where anybody can create something new and wonderful. In my last post, I spoke of the positive benefit of connecting the dots between different sources of inspiration. It’s the space between these dots that gives rise to something new or different. Yet the social graph on which Facebook is built upon takes the opposite view. It seeks to close the spaces in between these dots, by assuming our social bonds remain fixed.

But let’s go back to Stephen Johnson’s view that the bigger the platform the bigger the gravitational pull. Because when something gets too big and collapses under its own gravity, that’s a black hole.

 

 

tt twitter The illusion behind Facebooks Social Graph

Are Friends Electric? How Brands and Bots challenge online behaviour

Earlier this week I got drawn into an interesting development around a well known brand’s Facebook account that my digital team manages, which made me question the very essence of managing branded communication across social media channels.

The client contacted the team to say a suspicious post had appeared on the Facebook wall and asked what would be our recommendation? The post itself came from someone by the name of Louise Marie Oliver. The only info in her Facebook profile is that she’s 29 years old and engaged. On clicking on her profile I was redirected to the Facebook profile page of surfingwithseraphim. For the sake of simplicity I’ll refer to Louise Marie Oliver.

Screen shot 2011 07 24 at 09.51.33 297x300 Are Friends Electric? How Brands and Bots challenge online behaviour

The image above is a sample of what Louise typically posts on their wall. There are the occasional comments to posts, but they all come from Louise herself. There is no trace of  friends or followers responding through commentary.

However Louise’s crime is not spamming the client’s Facebook wall, rather she took the original branded messaging and reposted it on the client’s site. In essence this person is less a person and just an empty echo chamber.

The community manager insisted that the post remain on the site and that this was valuable brand equity. But is it? Therein lies the dilemma for brands that I believe will be increasingly tricky to combat online – when is a person not a person but a script or a bot? If it is the latter, do they intrinsically have less value in the eyes of a brand?

Widely regarded as the father of modern day computing, Alan Turin posed the question in 1950 “Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?“. This was the key question that posed in his paper when devising the Turing Test to determine if a computer could fool a person by engaging with them and making the person think they were human.

In crude a sense that is being played out right now across the social media channels and will get worst. Gartner estimated that across Twitter and Facebook 10 percent of all friends / followers will be bots. With the brave new online world of bottom up communication and marketing espoused by Clay Shirky and Brian Solis, does the advent of bots challenge this model? If brands are reaching out and reacting positively to their communities on the assumption that the are human, will there come a tipping point when the time and effort to weed out bots becomes prohibitively expensive?

Another possible scenario (and for the record I expect this already happens) is for brands themselves to use bots for their own purpose. A simple script tracking key words or hash tags would enable brands to quickly establish a community through a simple bot responding.

You could end up with bots communicating with one another across social media channels like some carefully orchestrated Q&A session. Alternatively the social messaging equivalent of this could manifest itself at which point people will simply get bored and move on.

To that end brand social community managers already face the sissyphean task of monitoring messaging to determine those that go ‘off brand’. The thin line between censorship and freedom of speech is something brands will do well to navigate sensibly across social media channels. Nevertheless accountability should be given to community managers to delete posts from those suspected of being bots, otherwise they destroy the very social media channels they police.

All thoughts are my own etc etc

tt twitter Are Friends Electric? How Brands and Bots challenge online behaviour

Google+ Social Tracking

social engagement 640 Google+ Social Tracking

 

Google has generated a great deal of buzz around the release of Google+ – its attempt at challenging the fertile social ground that Facebook and Twitter have led. Whether the Google+ button will be as ubiquitous as Facebook’s ‘Like’ or the Tweet button will no doubt be played out over the coming months.

In parallel with the news on Google+ was the inclusion of Social tracking for Google Analytics. In essence, the ability to track and add a value to social interactions. Previously I had used a combination of advanced segmentation to work out traffic generated from social media as a crude rule of thumb, and the excellent PostRank.

Evidently Google liked PostRank as well as they recently bought the service. It will be interesting to see how this service will be integrated into Google’s Social Tracking.

Going forward the killer feature of Google’s Social Tracking is that it’s not just limited to +1′s but also Facebook Likes and Tweets and other social interactions. Being able to calculate how a web page is shared across multiple social channels plays nicely into the hands of Google’s core money making operations of online advertisements.

For non programmers, setting up Google Social Tracking in analytics is slightly convoluted, but if you feel inclined to tackle this head over to here for a detailed overview. In the case of wordpress plugins, you need to install Google+1 Button plugin and no doubt in the next few weeks there will be updates to Facebook and Twitter Plugins for WordPress by 3rd party developers.

The reports themselves will add a another layer of detail in understanding the impact of social media engagement by accurately tracking user’s interactions across a site. Certainly this may pave the way to assigning meaningful ROI’s on social interactions from the pervasive ‘finger in the air’ model.

tt twitter Google+ Social Tracking

Social Seeding Strategy: Dark Knight Rises

Continuing on from my earlier post into The Dark Knight’s social media campaign,  Warner Bros have kick started their seeding strategy for Christopher Nolan’s follow-up The Dark Knight Rises with a 12 month slow burn.

Already the site went live, playing some obscure soundtrack. Some persistent fan managed to slow down the audio and decrypted the message as #thefirerises . Tweeting the phrase fills in a part of an image of one of the main character’s Bane played by Tom Hardy.

In my post, A Guide to Social Media Propagation I outlined the key considerations for establishing a successful seeding strategy. This latest Dark Knight Rises campaign prompted me to realise that what I neglected to mention was the question what is the time plan for delivering the social strategy?

In the case of such an anticipated franchise such as Batman, the strategy could have been to put a news blackout to raise curiosity for the movie’s launch. Rather, like Warner Bros did for The Dark Knight, the digital strategy is built on building up anticipation over the course of 12 months by drip feeding information on the characters and storyline.

Initially the social strategy is relatively basic with a simple microsite and a twitter hashtag to lead the audience to the big reveal. Nevertheless I would predict that a more expansive campaign will take shape in the form of various sites, and across many mediums.

From a digital strategy standpoint I will look forward to documenting how this manifest itself over the coming months and I dare say this will start to move across a number of digital and offline channels.

tt twitter Social Seeding Strategy: Dark Knight Rises

Digital and Social Marketing – Why It’s Not About Awards

i am awesome Digital and Social Marketing   Why Its Not About Awards

Marketing Award ceremonies you got to love em! The love and respect of your peers when you win. The jealousy and back biting when you lose to a competitor.

The booze keeps flowing. The wheel keeps turning.

But without wanting to sound pious, it shouldn’t be just about awards. Digital and social campaigns should extend beyond the execution of a creative idea. The linkage between our online identities and our social media interactions over time continues at a pace and yet marketeers and brands struggle to make sense of this exponential increase in data.

The true value of a marketing campaign going forward will be the one that can specifically identify its core audience base, create targeted messaging that is both relevant and meaningful. It’s about increasing the odds that audience will react positively be it to increase brand awareness, or to sell more product or service.

Delivering a digital or social campaign is not about awards. It’s about delivering a personal experience, but within our social and interest groups.

It’s about delivering an engaging or valuable proposition.

tt twitter Digital and Social Marketing   Why Its Not About Awards

Sunday Times Social List

Measuring Social Equity. The Sunday Times Social List

Planning for success is one thing. Executing against that plan is the flip side to that coin.

Screen shot 2011 05 18 at 14.07.10 300x92 Measuring Social Equity. The Sunday Times Social List

The Sunday Times Social List is an attempt to muscle in on the social capital / measurement services offered by Klout and Peerindex. In terms of business alignment it fits nicely into News International’s evolution into the digital space as well as a natural extension of The Times Rich List.

Even a media empire can be caught unaware by the ebb and flow of our social media interactions in the digital space.

A great idea such as the Social List is ultimately rendered worthless if it goes offline for even a few hours let alone a few days.

tt twitter Measuring Social Equity. The Sunday Times Social List

How to Measure Your Audience Through Social Media

The Fallacy of Social Media Engagement

One of the fallacies of social media is that you need deep pockets to effectively engage with your audience. There are a whole suite of social media products out there offering social media listening services, analytics, and cross channel platforms either for free or for a fee. The permutations and choices are many with each one claiming to have a definitive solution in managing and understanding social media interactions. The reality is there is no magic pill to make social media engagement easier and scaleable.

The truth of the matter is that in order to get a Return On Investment (ROI) from social media you have to put in the time, to understand what’s right for your goals and objectives. Be bold in experimenting with new approaches to measuring success. Learn from failure. Reboot and reiterate.

A Very Long Engagement

Take the time to align your approach to social media engagement with the goals and objectives. Not only do you need a thorough understanding of which digital channels your audience sits in, but also how they interact within those channels. Overlay the complexity around the tone of voice you want to convey in order to respond to people in those channels and you have a delicate balancing act.

Regardless if you or a brand you represent is producing or curating content it’s of absolute importance to understand how the audience reacts. To my mind the tool I use to gauge people’s interactions with my blog postings is through PostRank Analytics.

PostRank is a great tool that enables you to gauge how many people interacted with each blog posting you make over time. Not only does it track page views like Google Analytics, but is also determines who has shared the content, on which digital channels and applies a score. This research tool effectively makes you understand what content is of most interest to your audience and in what channel.

 

Screen shot 2011 05 11 at 11.39.41 How to Measure Your Audience Through Social Media

In combination with Postrank, Crowdbooster can provide valuable insight into your audiences behaviour. Crowdbooster allows you to determine the reach of your audience. This tool enables you to understand 1) how many people your tweet has reached, essentially a tweet’s virility; 2) monitors follower’s growth, enabling you to accurate pinpoint factors that lead to growth; 3) Identify influential followers within your audience; 4) determine who in your audience retweets your content; 5) finally Crowdbooster can determine the optimum time for you to tweet you your audience and allows you to schedule those tweets.

Screen shot 2011 05 12 at 14.14.21 How to Measure Your Audience Through Social Media

Identifying your Audience in their Social Media Channel

Get to know and understand how Google Analytics (GA) works. The scope and scale of GA is too broad for this post alone. However one tip I can provide is the ability to track users arriving to your site from social media channels.

Step 1: Determine the source of your visitors by social media channels. Google tracks every referral to your site, so by making a list you can then begin to segment social media traffic from organic and paid search.

Screen shot 2011 05 12 at 14.40.31 How to Measure Your Audience Through Social Media

Step 2: Get familiar with advanced segment in GA. With the list of social media channels driving traffic you can start to split them out. In the example below I’ve applied the condition that if a traffic source contains a particular value identified from the list in step 1, it is to be regarded as a social media channel.

Screen shot 2011 05 12 at 14.48.42 How to Measure Your Audience Through Social Media

Once you have saved and activated your advanced segments you will be able to determine how much influence social media channels has in driving traffic to your site.

Screen shot 2011 05 12 at 14.53.56 How to Measure Your Audience Through Social Media

 

This approach allows you to determine the most valuable social media channels to invest your time and effort.

My Two Cents

The sheer choice of social media tools available can be confusing and will continue to be so for the foreseeable future with consolidation and contraction in this area. However try not to get hung up on tools, rather make sure you have an understanding of your social media goals and objectives and what measurements align with those goals. Fundamentally it is the techniques that bring longevity and success to social media programs not the tools used in isolation.

 

Dedicated to the memory of Isobel

tt twitter How to Measure Your Audience Through Social Media

Building Empires Out of Sand

Can a brand effectively take virtual shareholders as advocates of their brand? This is the question I ask regarding Empire Avenue – a hybrid game / social media measurement platform.

Screen shot 2011 05 01 at 09.56.421 Building Empires Out of Sand

 

Effectively Empire Avenue enables users to buy and sell shares in a brand or individual based upon their output across other social media channels like Facebook, Twitter et al. From an individual perspective this is a compelling case. For example I invest in people whose blogs I read, or who I engage in commentary with. I have a vested interest because not only do I digest the content, but value is attached already to these people’s published output.

Now let’s extend the stocks and shares metaphor to brands. If I value a brand, there’s a sliding scale of engagement I can participate in online. 1) I can be part of the mainstream population e.g. a non fan who participates with a campaign inspite of the brand; 2) a fan who participates with a campaign because of the brand; 3) a brand advocate who becomes an extension of the brand and campaign – influencers who spread the word.

But do I attach value in the volume of engagement that brand chooses to adopt as part of it’s social media strategy and one in which Empire Avenue measures? Arguably no. It’s the content that interest me, that’s what gets me inspired, and moves me from the mainstream, to a fan, and ultimately an advocate.

So whilst Empire Avenue is an immersive game, it’s reach for brands is limited to being a research tool as oppose to engaging new and existing audiences. This research element is great news for digital strategists both brand and agency side to determine the reach of competitors.

 

 

tt twitter Building Empires Out of Sand

A Guide to Social Media Propagation and Planning – Part 2

Any digital strategist or planner worth their salt, needs to have an adaptable framework with which creative ideas can sit in. In this post I’m going to outline my framework and techniques that I’ve used when planning social media engagement.

Framework

One of the frustrating experiences within integrated agencies is that the digital space is often considered an after thought to be grafted later on down the process. This is wrong, wrong wrong. Just as traditional planners are drafted in at the beginning of a campaign, there is real value is bringing to getting a digital strategist / planner involved from day one to flesh out the landscape.

During the planning stage the following questions are invaluable in the execution of any digital or social media seeding strategy:

  1. What are the goals and objectives of the campaign? Without a common goal and objective that’s clear, concise and understood by all can you have success
  2. Who is your target audience? Here a planner needs to get really into quantitative and qualitative data to understand who the audience is and where they are located online. You can segment audiences behaviour based upon their social profile, the digital channels they inhabit and the interactions they perform in those channels.
  3. Getting people to participate?  What are the motivations that compel people to interact on online? Is it self-actualisation, altruism, clarification of status? It’s around these considerations that tangible incentives and triggers need to be established that can influence audience behaviour. {insert pyramid]
  4. Reducing the barriers for participation is key after researching the audiences key motivations. You can come up with the most brilliant campaign idea but if the user experience is bad or the build poorly executed then success will be hard to attain. Therefore consider what the functional needs of the audience are in each digital channel.
  5. Making the experience as frictionless as possible needs to be another consideration. I recently worked on a campaign where the existing signup process took a good 3-4 minutes to complete. Looking at making the most effective and simple process for people to engage with a site or campaign is another key consideration.
  6. What creative assets do you have at your disposal? If you have existing assets the first thing to do is to perform an audit to see if they fit with the creative idea. Discard those creative assets that are poor quality or no longer relevant for the campaign. My advice is do involve the client in the audit process to help facilitate the process
  7. Ask yourself and others the question why would any one share? If you have access to research groups I would actively encourage anybody to ask their chosen audience what compels them to share online? (As a side note I asked a research group a few weeks ago if they created anything online? This was met with a resounding no. But when I rephrased the question do you upload and share photo’s, links, and video? It was an equivocal yes!)
  8. Determine your communication plan or seeding strategy. Borrowing from Dan Zarella’s presentation on The Science of Timing he comes up with a number of stats. Retweets work best late in the day and in the week; weekends are best for Facebook sharing; Experiment with emails during the weekend; send emails early in the morning; blog on the weekend for comments; blog early in the morning for links; and blog more frequently
  9. Align KPI’s that are relevant to the goals and objectives of the campaign. To aid the process walk through the user journeys to determine the key interactions and don’t fudge the importance of ROI.

The social channels are awash with the ongoing debate of Social Media ROI and whether it’s relevant. To my mind, it’s easier to dismiss something as being irrelevant without putting in the effort to understand the dynamics. The vast majority of people who call themselves social media ninja’s / guru’s etc have a vested interest in continuing to keep social media wrapped up in fuzzy thinking.

To my mind the genuine thought leaders in social media are those willing to apply qualitative and quantitative insight into our online social interactions and to put themselves under the microscope of critical thought.

 

tt twitter A Guide to Social Media Propagation and Planning – Part 2

A Guide to Social Media Propagation and Planning – Part 1

I want this to go viral…

If I had a penny for every time somebody says the phrase ‘I want this campaign to go viral’ I would probably have £2.52. It’s very easy to fall into the fallacy that the idea behind a viral must be good, rather then to ask the question was it executed successfully. Through the next series of blog posts I’m going to determine some of the key factors to consider when propagating ideas through social media channels and debunk the myth of so called ‘viral’ ideas.

Rice Famers

In Malcolm Gladwell’s Outliers, a whole chapter is dedicated to the techniques and dedication of paddy farmers to grow sufficient rice to support their families. Gladwell offers the following insight in an interview for NPR in November 2008:

Rice farming is the most labor-intensive form of agriculture known to man. It is also the most cognitively demanding form of agriculture … There is a direct correlation between effort and reward. You get exactly out of your rice paddy what you put into it.

Why not extend that concept of providing a rigorous framework when planning out a digital or social media campaign?

Our Online Motivations

The first question to ask is what causes people to spread ideas, concepts, and memes to others? To borrow from the ever insightful Patricia McDonald there are 5 key motivational touch-points

Screen shot 2011 03 20 at 16.22.56 A Guide to Social Media Propagation and Planning   Part 1

The internet and the social media channels that sit on top of it have set the conditions for our messages to be propagated in real time and to an audience of billions. This is a seismic shift away from the communication and propagation of ideas by governments, big business, and advertising firms. Instead it’s never been easier to create and share an idea online with our peers. To broadcast as well as consume online content.

Reach and Influence

Given the framework the internet has provided in enabling us to reach a mass audience, the propagation of those ideas is influenced by two factors: reach and influence. Griffin Farley’s presentation asks that you ‘Plan not for the people you reach, but for the people they reach‘. Griffin also down plays the role of the influencer in the transmission of  ideas, and illustrates the point with the analogy that it isn’t the influential cigarette that burns down a tinderbox forrest. The point being that you need to target and plan the right channels rather than the right influencer to influence those channels.

However taking the idea further, if you have a close-knit online community, with a clear understanding of the motives and patterns of behaviour that operates within that community, the more likely that the concept of influence transcends the select few and becomes endemic within that community. The social reputation service Peerindex seems to have the factor of context in mind when it comes to applying a measure of a person’s influence within a particular field.

Rinse and spin your Marketing Campaigns

In his video presentation – The Science of Social Media, Dan Zarella of Hubspot explains that our time and attention is the scarce resource with which viral ideas need to compete and evolve in order for us to engage. There is no magic formula for a viral idea, rather ever evolving marketing campaigns have to applied in order to determine what resonates with the audience.

Lifespan and the f-word

Another key factor Dan addresses is the level of commitment required by the user to interact with an idea. On a sliding scale you could have retweets, that take up a fraction of a person’s time, compared to say to the level of time and attention a person invests in writing an informed article for Wikipedia. Similarly the fecundity – how quickly an something grows – of a tweet in inversely proportionate to it’s lifespan. So tweets have a short life span compared with a published article. Planning for propagation has to factor in the attention span and level of commitment required by both broadcaster and the recipient and the likelihood of them passing it on.

Screen shot 2011 03 20 at 15.22.26 294x300 A Guide to Social Media Propagation and Planning   Part 1
Modified slide from Dan Zarella's Presentation

Summary

There is no such thing as a guaranteed viral campaign. I’ve been in meetings with some very senior social media ‘Mad-Men’ demanding the next great idea is guaranteed to go viral without discussing how the campaign is going to be executed against. But in part 2 I will try and illustrate techniques that will increase the likelihood of something being propagated.

tt twitter A Guide to Social Media Propagation and Planning   Part 1