On Social Media, Cultural Relevancy, and Paying for News

In previous blog articles (here) I’ve covered the various business models of media and in particular the pay wall model adopted by The Times.

A Slideshare presentation by Made by Many puts the emphasis on Cultural Relevancy being a key driver for driving traffic to generalist online news sites. Typically, people share news that is relevant to them, and this has always been the case even before the internet as we know it today became ubiquitous.

Therefore as in the case of The Times, the moment a barrier, in the form of the pay wall was put up, it’s cultural relevancy has been stunted by a lack of sharing.

To prove the point I used backtype, which measures social media commentary, to investigate whether cultural relevancy for online news is intrinsically linked to being a) free and b) shareable.

In order to perform a meaningful comparison I measured The Times against The Huffington Post:

Screen shot 2011 06 18 at 11.15.29 300x48 On Social Media, Cultural Relevancy, and Paying for News

It becomes clear that in terms of cultural relevancy, a lot more social media equity is contained within The Huffington Post when compared with the Times.

Neverthless I wanted to make sure I was comparing apples with apples and focused purely on online news in the UK. In this case The Times vs The Guardian.

Screen shot 2011 06 18 at 11.21.58 300x69 On Social Media, Cultural Relevancy, and Paying for News

Again The Times is significantly behind those online news publications which are free.

But let’s not assume that a pay wall is a barrier for conversation and sharing of content. The evidence would suggest it impacts specifically general online news. When you start to apply specialist online subscription services – such as the FT, cultural relevancy is not impacted.

Screen shot 2011 06 18 at 11.41.57 300x49 On Social Media, Cultural Relevancy, and Paying for News

 

What becomes evident is that cultural relevancy is determined by three core factors: relevant content, directed to an engaged audience, which encourages conversation. The strategy employed by The Times has diminished it’s cultural relevancy by starving conversation.

Contrast that with subscription services that offer specialist insight such as The Economist or the FT.com which maintains and encourages an eco-system based on dialogue and sharing.

Cultural relevancy is not about paid or free content, it’s about making content a talking point that’s relevant to you, the consumer.

Screen shot 2011 06 18 at 14.13.19 300x98 On Social Media, Cultural Relevancy, and Paying for News
Courtesy of Made by Many


tt twitter On Social Media, Cultural Relevancy, and Paying for News

  • http://www.thisisbackpacking.com Tiffany Paralta

    what a lovely well developed system to give credence to the social media buzz word one-liners. well played match-ups as well

  • http://invisibleinkdigital.com Invisibleinkdigital

    Thank you very much Tiffany. I think the key for any strategic insight is to find the appropriate tools and methodologies to back up a certain perspective. In this case there seemed to be a tangible link between online engagement and the decline in relevancy for The Times.Â